Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 28;10(4):e0122731. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122731

Table 5. Result summary of three different methods on TUM dataset.

Accuracy % AUC Sensitivity Specificity
MCI vs. AD P GMM+MS 72.7 (74.0) 0.81 (0.80) 0.77 (0.78) 0.68 (0.69)
AAL 74.8 0.80 0.77 0.72
t-test 72.6 0.79 0.77 0.68
G GMM+MS 73.8 (74.8) 0.82 (0.82) 0.77 (0.78) 0.71 (0.71)
AAL 70.5 0.78 0.72 0.69
t-test 65.5 0.71 0.68 0.63
NC vs. AD P GMM+MS 90.5 (89.5) 0.93 (0.96) 0.94 (0.88) 0.89 (0.89)
AAL 89.0 0.95 0.94 0.85
t-test 89.4 0.97 0.86 0.90
G GMM+MS 91.6 (88.1) 0.97 (0.96) 0.94 (0.84) 0.90 (0.89)
AAL 89.0 0.95 0.91 0.88
t-test 92.0 0.98 0.93 0.91
NC vs. MCI P GMM+MS 88.0 (87.2) 0.95 (0.93) 0.87 (0.85) 0.89 (0.89)
AAL 81.5 0.88 0.82 0.79
t-test 81.1 0.90 0.64 0.89
G GMM+MS 87.7 (85.3) 0.95 (0.92) 0.87 (0.82) 0.88 (0.87)
AAL 78.0 0.90 0.74 0.80
t-test 89.5 0.94 0.89 0.90

Results from AIC are noted in brackets, following the BIC results.