Table 4.
Intercept | Linear Slope | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Coefficient (SE) | 95% CI | Coefficient (SE) | 95% CI | |
Level 1 (family) | ||||
Financial assistance | -.31** (.09) | [-1.31, .69] | .02 (.02) | [-.10, .14] |
Hollingshead score | .01** (.00) | [-.99, 1.01] | -.001 (.001) | [-.12, .12] |
Youth age | .07 (.04) | [-.97, 1.11] | -.01 (.01) | [-.13, .11] |
Youth gender | .09 (.10) | [-.97, 1.15] | .03 (.02) | [-.09, .15] |
Caregiver gender | .15 (.13) | [-.89, 1.19] | -.04 (.03) | [-.16, .08] |
Caregiver ethnicity: | ||||
White 0=non white | .04 (.09) | [-1.02, 1.10] | .002 (.02) | [-.12, .13] |
Latino/a | -.04 (.11) | [-1.08, 1.00] | -.01 (.02) | [-.13, .11] |
Black | -.08 (.13) | [-1.12, .96] | .02 (.03) | [-.10, .14] |
Caregiver-therapist ethnic match | .01 (.10) | [-1.05, 1.07] | .02 (.02) | [-.10, .14] |
Level 2 (therapist) | ||||
Attitude toward MST | .32** (.11) | [-.72, 1.36] | -.01 (.02) | [-.12, .10] |
Perceived support | .07 (.07) | [-.99, 1.13] | .01 (.01) | [-.10, .12] |
Gender | -.07 (.15) | [-1.13, .99] | .02 (.02) | [-.10, .14] |
Note. CI = confidence interval. Gender was dummy coded with 0 = male and 1 = female. Ethnicity was dummy coded with 0 = comparison group and 1 = particular ethnicity (e.g., 0 = Non-White and 1 = White).
p < .01.