Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 7;5(1):9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2015.01.001

Table 2.

Efficacy data for Teladorsagia circumcincta against each active tested (A – Albendazole, B – Levamisole and C – Ivermectin) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the 7 farms over the 4 years of the project and the one follow up year. The faecal egg counts allocated to T. circumcincta based on the proportion of this species found in the control cultures and used as a covariant in the analysis are also given.

Year of test
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
(A) Albendazole
Farm B % efficacy 51 86 92 NT 71
95% CI 12–73 79–91 89–93 9–92
FEC 175 1101 875 73
Farm D % efficacy 96 98 100 100 100
95% CI 95–97 97–99 97–100 96–100 98–100
FEC 625 153 118 30 86
Farm H % efficacy 96 100 98 95 98
95% CI 93–98 97–100 94–99 93–96 96–99
FEC 21 114 25 35 72
Farm K % efficacy 40 NT 100 67 96
95% CI −30–72 95–100 55–77 94–98
FEC 84 44 242 265
Farm M % efficacy −9 70 92 97 83
95% CI −55–24 53–81 69–98 94–99 59–92
FEC 53 596 160 1007 75
Farm P % efficacy 87 53 73 53 NT
95% CI 78–92 24–71 61–80 25–69
FEC 88 48 30 23
Farm W % efficacy 92 NT 97 56 91
95% CI 91–93 85–99 31–73 68–97
FEC 285 32 102 104
(B) Levamisole
Farm B % efficacy 27 92 98 NT 56
95% CI −1–48 85–95 97–99 17–79
FEC 175 1101 875 73
Farm D % efficacy 75 99 96 98 98
95% CI 50–87 98–100 93–98 97–100 90–100
FEC 625 153 118 30 86
Farm H % efficacy 91 98 100 98 94
95% CI 64–98 85–100 93–100 75–100 78–98
FEC 21 114 25 35 72
Farm K % efficacy 88 NT 100 95 94
95% CI 80–93 96–100 84–99 84–98
FEC 84 44 242 265
Farm M % efficacy 70 99 98 100 77
95% CI 8–90 93–100 76–100 99–100 50–88
FEC 53 596 160 1007 75
Farm P % efficacy 36 94 96 89 NT
95% CI −19–66 47–99 90–98 66–96
FEC 88 48 30 23
Farm W % efficacy 78 NT 99 86 92
95% CI 65–86 98–100 59–95 78–97
FEC 285 32 102 104
(C) Ivermectin
Farm D % efficacy 93 98 100 100 100
95% CI 79–97 95–99 98–100 96–100 97–100
FEC 625 153 118 30 86
Farm H % efficacy 90 100 33 97 95
95% CI 52–98 98–100 −131–75 91–99 76–99
FEC 21 114 25 35 72
Farm K % efficacy 10 NT 79 54 95
95% CI −155–68 28–94 15–76 84–98
FEC 84 44 242 265
Farm M % efficacy −128 64 66 97 71
95% CI −237–−55 45–77 50–77 93–98 53–80
FEC 53 596 160 1007 75
Farm P % efficacy 82 72 100 90 NT
95% CI 42–95 −95–96 96–100 74–96
FEC 88 48 30 23
Farm W % efficacy 58 NT 99 97 67
95% CI 29–75 93–100 73–100 12–88
FEC 285 32 102 104

NT, not tested.