Table 2.
City | Neighborhood | Classification | Poverty rate,* % | Selected racial composition,* % | Observations† |
Atlanta | Midtown | Advantaged | 9.1 | 70.2 white | 32 |
Oakland City | Disadvantaged black | 35.4 | 87.5 black | 25 | |
Baltimore | Canton | Advantaged | 11.8 | 75.4 white | 27 |
West Baltimore | Disadvantaged black | 37.9 | 83.7 black | 27 | |
Boston | Back Bay | Advantaged | 9.7 | 86.0 white | 26 |
Dorchester | Disadvantaged black | 18.8 | 45.8 black | 28 | |
Chicago | Lincoln Park | Advantaged | 11.6 | 82.5 white | 34 |
North Lawndale | Disadvantaged black | 41.8 | 91.7 black | 23 | |
Los Angeles | Century City | Advantaged | 9.7 | 76.8 white | 28 |
Crenshaw | Disadvantaged black | 25.3 | 68.9 black | 24 | |
NY Brooklyn | Cobble Hill | Advantaged | 4.3 | 71.2 white | 28 |
Bedford-Stuyvesant | Disadvantaged black | 29.6 | 77.3 black | 28 | |
NY Manhattan | Upper East Side | Advantaged | 6.0 | 81.2 white | 28 |
East Harlem | Disadvantaged Latino | 35.5 | 56.6 Latino | 24 | |
Philadelphia | Fox Chase | Advantaged | 8.9 | 78.9 white | 25 |
Nicetown | Disadvantaged black | 32.2 | 93.8 black | 14 | |
Juniata | Disadvantaged Latino | 39.3 | 52.1 Latino | 18 | |
Phoenix | Ahwatukee Foothills | Advantaged | 6.1 | 73.3 white | 32 |
Central City | Disadvantaged Latino | 44.2 | 64.4 Latino | 23 | |
San Antonio | North Central | Advantaged | 3.8 | 74.0 white | 29 |
Southwest San Antonio | Disadvantaged Latino | 38.8 | 92.2 Latino | 28 | |
Seattle | Madrona | Advantaged | 4.4 | 74.8 white | 17 |
Leschi | Disadvantaged black | 18.1 | 36.2 black | 27 | |
International District | Disadvantaged Asian | 43.1 | 49.0 Asian | 12 | |
Washington, DC | Dupont Circle | Advantaged | 11.1 | 73.6 white | 28 |
Anacostia | Disadvantaged black | 31.6 | 97.1 black | 29 |
Source: Authors’ compilation, derived from Zillow neighborhood boundaries and aggregated 2007–2011 American Community Survey tract-level data.
Forty-nine posts were flagged for removal, and were not included in the main regression analysis in Table 1.