Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 6;112(16):4994–4998. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414139112

Table 2.

Neighborhood advantage and disadvantage, by city

City Neighborhood Classification Poverty rate,* % Selected racial composition,* % Observations
Atlanta Midtown Advantaged 9.1 70.2 white 32
Oakland City Disadvantaged black 35.4 87.5 black 25
Baltimore Canton Advantaged 11.8 75.4 white 27
West Baltimore Disadvantaged black 37.9 83.7 black 27
Boston Back Bay Advantaged 9.7 86.0 white 26
Dorchester Disadvantaged black 18.8 45.8 black 28
Chicago Lincoln Park Advantaged 11.6 82.5 white 34
North Lawndale Disadvantaged black 41.8 91.7 black 23
Los Angeles Century City Advantaged 9.7 76.8 white 28
Crenshaw Disadvantaged black 25.3 68.9 black 24
NY Brooklyn Cobble Hill Advantaged 4.3 71.2 white 28
Bedford-Stuyvesant Disadvantaged black 29.6 77.3 black 28
NY Manhattan Upper East Side Advantaged 6.0 81.2 white 28
East Harlem Disadvantaged Latino 35.5 56.6 Latino 24
Philadelphia Fox Chase Advantaged 8.9 78.9 white 25
Nicetown Disadvantaged black 32.2 93.8 black 14
Juniata Disadvantaged Latino 39.3 52.1 Latino 18
Phoenix Ahwatukee Foothills Advantaged 6.1 73.3 white 32
Central City Disadvantaged Latino 44.2 64.4 Latino 23
San Antonio North Central Advantaged 3.8 74.0 white 29
Southwest San Antonio Disadvantaged Latino 38.8 92.2 Latino 28
Seattle Madrona Advantaged 4.4 74.8 white 17
Leschi Disadvantaged black 18.1 36.2 black 27
International District Disadvantaged Asian 43.1 49.0 Asian 12
Washington, DC Dupont Circle Advantaged 11.1 73.6 white 28
Anacostia Disadvantaged black 31.6 97.1 black 29
*

Source: Authors’ compilation, derived from Zillow neighborhood boundaries and aggregated 2007–2011 American Community Survey tract-level data.

Forty-nine posts were flagged for removal, and were not included in the main regression analysis in Table 1.