Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 27;28(2):468–480. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12582

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Example distributions of the frequency (square-root transformed) of individuals bearing mInline graphic-alleles. Panel (a) when leakage is absent or fitness effects are additive, heteroplasmy is nearly negligible and most individuals contain only Inline graphic mitochondria. Panel (b) when leakage is present and fitness effects reflect a scenario of ’reverse dominance’ (dashed lines in Fig. 2b, c), levels of heteroplasmy can be substantial, particularly when Inline graphic is dominant in males, but recessive in females (solid line). By contrast, when Inline graphic is recessive in males, yet dominant in females, levels of polymorphism are substantially lower. For the restrictive range of parameters for which Inline graphic invades (when selection on males is very strong), it will achieve fixation (dashed line). Parameters throughout: Inline graphic; panel (a) Inline graphic; dashed line: Inline graphic. Panel (b) Inline graphic (solid line). Inline graphic (dashed line).