Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 16;97:262–270. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.006

Table 1.

Impact of selective attention to phonology on traditional auditory ERP components: TANOVA, indexing whole-map topographical differences, and Global Field Power, indexing map strength differences, between the rhyme and tone judgment tasks.

P1
44-92 ms
N1
92-212 ms
P2
212-292 ms
N2a
292-360 ms
N2b
360-426 ms
CNV
426-850 ms
GFP rhyme Mean (SEM) GFP tone Mean (SEM) 0.58 (0.04) 0.59 (0.05) 0.97 (0.16) 1.05 (0.18) 0.86 (0.09) 0.73 (0.07) 0.78 (0.07) 0.81 (0.08) 0.80 (0.07) 0.79 (0.09) 1.07 (0.09) 1.20 (0.1)

GFP p-value ns ns p < 0.05 ns ns ns
Normalized TANOVA ns ns p < 0.0001 p < 0.000001 p < 0.05 p < 0.000001