. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 31.

Published in final edited form as: J Educ Psychol. 2014 Jul 7;107(1):79–95. doi: 10.1037/a0037210

Table 3.

Correlations among writing variables

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20
1.WIAT TDTO	1
2. WIAT Q Ideas	.48	1
3. Narrative Q Ideas	.45	.48	1
4. Pet Q Ideas	.38	.44	.34	1
5. WIAT Q Org	.57	.42	.40	.33	1
6. Narrative Q Org	.43	.37	.66	.29	.43	1
7. Pet Q Org	.38	.35	.40	.46	.43	.43	1
8. WJ-III Writing Fluency	.46	.45	.42	.28	.48	.47	.39	1
9. WIAT CIWS	.55	.52	.42	.40	.47	.43	.42	.53	1
10. Narrative CIWS	.46	.42	.48	.37	.40	.49	.45	.48	.73	1
11. Pet CIWS	.45	.42	.41	.53	.44	.42	.44	.44	.73	.69	1
12. WIAT # of words	.47	.66	.40	.43	.26	.23	.23	.35	.50	.30	.39	1
13. Narrative # of words	.44	.55	.58	.38	.22	.36	.27	.39	.42	.41	.40	.72	1
14. Pet # of words	.36	.44	.31	.63	.20	.19	.27	.23	.33	.25	.50	.66	.63	1
15. WIAT # of ideas	.37	.58	.36	.32	.17	.18	.15	.27	.38	.22	.28	.89	.68	.58	1
16. Narrative # of ideas	.42	.54	.57	.34	.22	.37	.27	.38	.41	.39	.38	.68	.94	.57	.65	1
17. Pet # of ideas	.35	.43	.35	.62	.23	.23	.32	.26	.34	.27	.50	.59	.58	.92	.54	.55	1
18, WIAT %CWS	.44	.29	.33	.28	.41	.37	.42	.46	.85	.66	.61	.20	.22	.15	.14	.22	.19	1
19. Narrative %CWS	.35	.19	.25	.21	.33	.32	.35	.35	.59	.83	.55	.08^ns	.08^ns	.06^ns	.03^ns	.09^ns	.09^ns	.71	1
20. Pet %CWS	.35	.26	.35	.22	.43	.38	.38	.43	.62	.61	.78	.14	.20	.09	.07^ns	.21	.14	.69	.65	1
21. RAN	−.36	−.37	−.40	−.29	−.30	−.32	−.29	−.43	−.40	−.36	−.37	−.41	−.43	−.34	−.31	−.42	−.33	−.35	−.24	−.35

Note. All the other coefficients are statistically significant at .05 level except those with ^ns.

WIAT = Wechsler Individual Achievement Test-Third Edition. TDTO = Theme Development and Text Organization. Q = Quality.

Org = Organization. WJ-III = WJ-III = Woodcock Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Narrative = Narrative prompt; Pet = Pet prompt; CIWS = correct minus incorrect word sequences. CWS = correct word sequences.