Table 3.
Membership Probabilities and Item Response Probabilities of the Five-Latent Class Model
Variable | Total yesa (%) |
Balanced pattern | Unbalanced pattern | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Class 1: High exchanges with both sets of parents (across all types of support) |
Class 2: Low exchanges with both sets of parents (across all types of support) |
Class 3: Giving exchanges with both sets of parents (across all types of support) |
Class 4: Exchanges only with own parents (across all types of support) |
Class 5: Moderate/high exchanges with own parents but, obligatory exchanges with parents- in-lawb |
|||
Class membership probability (γc) | |||||||
Total | .16 | .21 | .23 | .23 | .17 | ||
Men | .16 | .22 | .20 | .43 | .00 | ||
Women | .16 | .20 | .28 | .01 | .36 | ||
Item response probability (ρi|c) | |||||||
Parents | |||||||
Financial support given | 57.0 | .74 | .30 | .64 | .71 | .46 | |
Financial support received | 35.4 | .65 | .11 | .27 | .32 | .56 | |
Emotional support given | 63.0 | .94 | .07 | .75 | .68 | .83 | |
Emotional support received | 57.1 | .96 | .09 | .57 | .56 | .85 | |
Instrumental support given | 47.6 | .92 | .09 | .33 | .71 | .45 | |
Instrumental support received | 34.0 | .93 | .02 | .05 | .39 | .55 | |
Parents-in-law | |||||||
Financial support given | 50.2 | .78 | .27 | .65 | .28 | .63 | |
Financial support received | 28.8 | .64 | .12 | .42 | .15 | .16 | |
Emotional support given | 42.9 | .94 | .04 | .93 | .12 | .19 | |
Emotional support received | 35.2 | .91 | .04 | .75 | .11 | .03 | |
Instrumental support given | 41.9 | .88 | .13 | .56 | .15 | .53 | |
Instrumental support received | 28.2 | .84 | .06 | .37 | .14 | .12 |
Coded 1 (yes) for “sometimes” and “often” and 0 (no) for “rarely” and “not at all.”
Class 5 has moderate/high exchanges for all types of support with own parents, and moderate provision of instrumental and financial support to parents-in-laws, but low exchanges of emotional support.