Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 29.
Published in final edited form as: Annee Psychol. 2015 Jan 2;114(4):753–777. doi: 10.4074/S0003503314004072

Table 5. Consistency of Identification (% Same Children) of Specifically Poor Comprehenders (Lowest 25% with at least 1SD Discrepancy with Decoding) across Different Comprehension Tests When Decoding is Assessed with either Word Reading or Nonword Reading.

Test Comparison Discrepancy with Word Reading Discrepancy with Nonword Reading
Full Sample
 Read RC-D | Listen Composite 11 23
 Read RC-C | Listen Composite 24 36
 Read RC-D | Read RC-C 10 23
Younger Half of Sample
 Read RC-D | Listen Composite 6 15
 Read RC-C | Listen Composite 19 33
 Read RC-D | Read RC-C 7 19
Older Half of Sample
 Read RC-D | Listen Composite 17 31
 Read RC-C | Listen Composite 33 41
 Read RC-D | Read RC-C 11 25