Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 20;36(6):2187–2206. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22764

Table 1.

Category‐preferential ROI statistics

Contrast ROI N # Nodes Size (mm2) Peak t‐value
Tool > animal L medFGa 33 119 ± 53 61 ± 25 6.33 ± 1.48
R medFGa 31 108 ± 43 58 ± 27 6.19 ± 1.83
L pMTG 18 151 ± 48 75 ± 30 7.26 ± 2.22
L IPS 27 135 ± 56 63 ± 30 5.31 ± 1.59
L IPL 30 221 ± 89 68 ± 31 5.83 ± 2.03
L vPM 28 99 ± 50 58 ± 29 4.51 ± 1.43
Animal > tool L latFGa 33 136 ± 73 55 ± 29 6.90 ± 2.89
R latFGa 32 143 ± 52 82 ± 28 8.25 ± 1.99
R EBA 32 105 ± 46 74 ± 31 8.00 ± 2.72
R pSTS 29 122 ± 49 52 ± 28 5.19 ± 1.62
R AMG 15 134 ± 91 27 ± 18 4.19 ± 0.97
Face > scene R OFA 33 161 ± 63 80 ± 26 13.24 ± 3.88
Scene > face L PPAa 33 171 ± 38 75 ± 17 15.79 ± 3.99
R PPAa 33 179 ± 27 76 ± 18 16.67 ± 3.16
L RSC 33 161 ± 51 58 ± 25 8.72 ± 2.51
R RSC 33 193 ± 35 68 ± 16 10.97 ± 2.81
L OPA 33 200 ± 74 93 ± 23 13.20 ± 3.48
R OPA 33 127 ± 45 102 ± 26 13.38 ± 2.99

N, number of subjects with given ROI; All other values represent the mean ± s.d.; L, left; R, right.

a

VOTC ROIs