Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 30.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2012 Jan 24;131(6):1396–1406. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27372

Table 3.

Relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for prostate cancer risk according to quartiles of estimated phytanic acid intake in the ATBC Study, 1985–2006.

Quartiles of estimated phytanic acid intake
p trend
1 2 3 4
All prostate cancer cases (no.) 474 477 475 503
 Age- and energy-adjusted1 RR (95% CI) 1.0 0.99 (0.87–1.12) 0.98 (0.86–1.11) 1.05 (0.93–1.19) 0.49
 Multivariate2 RR (95% CI) 1.0 0.99 (0.87–1.12) 0.97 (0.85–1.11) 1.04 (0.91–1.20) 0.68
Localized prostate cancer cases (no.) 211 180 175 215
 Age- and energy-adjusted1 RR (95% CI) 1.0 0.83 (0.68–1.01) 0.78 (0.64–0.95) 0.94 (0.78–1.14) 0.44
 Multivariate2 RR (95% CI) 1.0 0.83 (0.68–1.01) 0.76 (0.62–0.94) 0.91 (0.74–1.13) 0.23
Advanced prostate cancer cases (no.) 86 126 114 112
 Age- and energy-adjusted1 RR (95% CI) 1.0 1.42 (1.08–1.87) 1.26 (0.95–1.67) 1.23 (0.93–1.63) 0.28
 Multivariate2 RR (95% CI) 1.0 1.43 (1.09–1.89) 1.31 (0.99–1.75) 1.38 (1.02–1.89) 0.06
1

Energy adjustment performed using the residual methods

2

Further adjusted for smoking dose and duration, trial intervention assignment, education level, and dietary fat intake