Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Toxicol. 2015 Apr 8;89(5):743–755. doi: 10.1007/s00204-015-1509-6

Table 3.

Addition of predicted transcription factors substantially increased connected component

Connected component—without TFS Connected component
with TFS
Module Genes in fantom Experimental Predicted Experimental Predicted
Salmon 163 14 47 SP1, NRF2, TCF3, AP1 125 132
Midnight Blue 105 0 14 SP1 75 105
Cyan 150 16 41 SP1, NRF1, SRY, SREBF1, MIR221, MEF2A, TCF3 121 130
Brown 463 31 163 SP1, JUN*, FOXF2, ATF4, TCF3, ELK1, STAT1*,
NRF1, MIR132
381 409
Magenta 106 14 26 SP1, ELK1, MEF2A 82 91

For each module, gene symbols were entered into FANTOM4 EdgeExpressDB and a predicted regulatory network was drawn based on experimental evidence (ChIP, published interactions and siRNA experiments), with and without the addition of predicted evidence (predicted transcription factor binding and microRNA). Transcription factors were added based on evidence of significantly over-represented motifs in MSigDB and textual evidence of involvement in Parkinson’s.

*

In the case of the Brown module, STAT1 and JUN were already in the module. “Connected component” consists of all genes that were not singletons in the predicted regulatory network