Table 2. Sequencing and Composite Method Comparisons [17]^*.

		% agreement (95% CI)	False Positive Rate (95% CI)
Sequencing Method	CNV loss 400kb to 1 Mb	94.3% (81.4%, 98.4%)	5.7% (1.6%, 18.6%)
	CNV loss > 1 Mb	97.3% (92.3%, 99.1%)	2.7% (0.9%, 7.7%)
	CNV gain 400 kb to 1 Mb	86.5% (72.0%, 94.1%)	13.5% (5.9%, 28.0%)
	CNV gain >1 Mb	98.8% (93.5%, 99.8%)	1.2% (0.2%, 6.5%)
Composite Method	CNV loss 400kb to 1 Mb	100.0% (65.3%, 100.0%)	0.0% (0.0%, 34.7%)
	CNV loss > 1 Mb	100.0% (76.1%, 100.0%)	0.0% (0.0%, 23.9%)
	CNV gain 400 kb to 1 Mb	94.6% (71.5%, 95.9%)	5.4% (4.1%, 28.5%)
	CNV gain >1 Mb	88.6% (62.5%, 96.7%)	11.4% (3.3%, 37.5%)

^*Affymetrix-defined hypervariable regions excluded