Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cancer Educ. 2015 Dec;30(4):616–622. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0746-3

Table 2.

Progression of PECaD CBP Evaluation

2003 -2007 2007 - 2010 2011-2014
Scientific Progression
    Peer reviewed publications X X X
    Grants applied for X X X
Community Engagement in PECaD
    New community-academic research partnerships developed X
    Level of engagement in each partnership (years involved, role, activities) X
    Research questions or projects emerging from existing collaborations X
    CBPR Survey* X
Community Attitudes Toward Medical Research
    Focus Groups X
    Pre/Post Tests following community research training X
    CBPR Survey* X
*CBPR SURVEY TOPICS Characteristics of the partnership (geography, organizations, gender, race/ethnicity, length of participation, role
Accomplishments of partnership
Overall effectiveness on CBPR Principles (1, 2,3, 4,6, 7, 8, 9)
New partnerships and research questions/projects developed or emerging from activities
How well partnership uses members’ time
Level of influence of self and others in group in partnership
Facilitation of member involvement in partnership
Member satisfaction with role in partnership
Membership satisfaction with influence in partnership
Comfort level for expressing opinions in partnership
Perceived level of openness in partnership
Perceived level of trust in partnership
Community benefits of participation
Community empowerment
Institutionalization of programs and/or partnerships