Table 2.

Means for students’ ratings on five aspects of midwifery care philosopy

Aspects	(n = 54) Experiment group (CoC)	(n = 52) Control group (Fragmented)	t	Significant between subterm	Significant between groups
Pre-clinical
Personalized care	1.39 (.712)	1.42 (.723)	-0.245	0,087
Holistic care	2.59 (1.055)	2.65 (1.136)	-0.288	0,774
Partnership care	1.04 (.672)	1.04 (.685)	-0.011	0,650	P>0.05
Collaborative care	2.17 (.746)	2.23 (.703)	-0.455	0,991
Evidence-based care	1.17 (.607)	1.15 (.607)	0.109	0,914
Total	8.35 (1.824)	8.50 (1.698)	-.432	0,666
Post-clinical
Personalized care	2.63 (.487)	1.67 (.648)	8.606	0,000
Holistic care	4.46 (.539)	3.37 (.886)	7.734	0,000
Partnership care	2.65 (.482)	1.38 (.491)	13.365	0,000	P<0.01
Collaborative care	3.57 (.499)	2.77 (.614)	7.418	0,000
Evidence-based care	2.65 (.482)	1.46 (.576)	11.519	0,000
Total	15.96 (1.063)	10.65 (1.170)	24.469	0,000
Significant between subterm within the same group
Personalized care	0,000	0,000
Holistic care	0,000	0,000
Partnership care	0,000	0,000
Collaborative care	0,000	0,000
Evidence-based care	0,000	0,000
Significant pre and post intervention	P < 0.01	P < 0.01

Independent t-test (df = 104 ; CI 95%) t table = 1.65964.