Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 14;113(7):2127–2136. doi: 10.1152/jn.00083.2014

Table 2.

Effects of age, sensory condition, performance of auditory CRT task, period, and visit on the RMS of the anterior-posterior trunk tilt (RMS trunk tilt)

Main Effects RMS Trunk Tilt, ° (Mean ± SD) F and P Values Interactions F and P Values
Age

  • Younger: 0.38 ± 0.10

  • Older: 0.60 ± 0.18

 F1,38 = 14.5, P < 0.001

  • Age-Condition

  • Condition-Visit

  • Condition-Period

  • F2.4,85.2 = 3.5, P = 0.028

  • F3,108 = 2.7, P = 0.049

  • F5.9,213.0 = 2.6, P = 0.021
Condition*†

  • Fixed/EO: 0.32 ± 0.14

  • Fixed/EOD: 0.37 ± 0.17

  • SR/EO: 0.51 ± 0.21

  • SR/EOD: 0.76 ± 0.28

 F2.4,85.2 = 284.2, P < 0.001
CRT

  • Off: 0.49 ± 0.20

  • On: 0.49 ± 0.18

 F1,36 = 0.2, P = 0.68
Period

  • 1: 0.50 ± 0.20

  • 2: 0.48 ± 0.19

  • 3: 0.48 ± 0.20

  • 4: 0.53 ± 0.20

 F2.1,75.1 = 8.3, P < 0.001
Visit

  • 1st: 0.53 ± 0.24

  • 2nd: 0.45 ± 0.14

 F1,36 = 10.6, P = 0.002
*

Post hoc test for Condition: all conditions were significantly different; P < 0.001.

†

Post hoc test for Period: period 4 significantly greater than periods 2 and 3; P < 0.001.