Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 28;113(7):2262–2270. doi: 10.1152/jn.00686.2014

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Relationship for the mirror and no-mirror conditions between the change in corticospinal excitability relative to rest and the change in associated activity of the left FCR relative to rest. The change in corticospinal excitability was positively correlated to the change in surface EMG activity for the mirror condition but not for the no-mirror condition (mirror: r = 0.496, P = 0.009; no-mirror: r = 0.297, P = 0.132; n = 27).