Table 2. SFX data collection statistics.
| Primary focus (nanofocus) | Refocused beam | |
|---|---|---|
| Space group |
P4 2 2 |
P4 2 2 |
| a, b, c () | 79.2, 79.2, 38.2 | 79.0, 79.0, 38.2 |
, , ( ) |
90, 90, 90 | 90, 90, 90 |
| No. of images | 1123382 | 543802 |
| No. of hits | 25647 | 74584 |
| No. of indexed images | 12894 | 9649 |
| Indexing rates (%) | 50.2 | 12.9 |
| Resolution range ()† | 401.9 (2.01.9) | 402.3 (2.42.3) |
| Completeness (%) | 100 (100) | 100 (100) |
| Multiplicity | 454 (114) | 339 (94) |
I/(I)
|
6.4 (1.57) | 4.9 (1.2) |
| R split ‡ | 0.112 (0.625) | 0.167 (0.728) |
| CC | 0.984 (0.409) | 0.947 (0.562) |
| CC* | 0.996 (0.762) | 0.986 (0.848) |
Overall B factor ( )§
|
41.5 | 67.7 |
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
=
(White et al., 2012 ▶), where
and
are intensities determined from all even and all odd numbered images, respectively.
It is likely that these Wilson B-factors are artificially high due to the inclusion of weak diffraction data at high resolution from crystals with poorer diffraction strength than average.





