Table 2.

Comparative analysis of cassava physical maps

LG	Nr. of scaf. (A)	Nr. of scaf. (B)	Common scaffolds	Nr. of new scaffolds (B)	Size of new scaffolds (bp)	Anchor markers
1	65	45	33	8	885,261	23
2	50	43	25	18	3,391,767	17
2.2	58	43	30	11	1,428,130	34
3	56	35	25	10	1,066,798	15
4	56	33	21	10	813,846	17
5	60	48	28	17	4,888,465	21
6	72	42	28	14	1,766,509	21
7	66	34	25	8	3,061,711	23
8	79	53	37	15	2,262,879	23
9	19	10	10	0	0	16
10	54	37	24	11	1,608,816	23
11	41	32	13	16	2,783,942	11
13	60	32	25	6	1,124,354	16
14	91	46	39	6	329,758	34
15	50	36	25	11	1,026,082	31
16	64	46	31	12	1,996,766	25
17	71	28	22	5	890,465	8
18	60	44	32	11	1,396,841	31
total	1,072	687	473	189	30,722,390	389

Unique scaffolds in the reported map version (A, Rabbi et al. [10]), in the map from the present study (B), common scaffolds between them, new mapped scaffolds from this study (B) anchored, their size in bp and the anchor markers per linkage group.