Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Infant Behav Dev. 2015 Mar 11;39:67–80. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2015.02.003

Table 2.

Concordance (in Percent) Between Hand Preference Group Assignment According to the Monthly Binomial Test (“Michel” Task) and Latent Class Analysis Based on “Michel” Task

Infant’s Age in Months 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Kappa, test of agreement 0.19 0.25* 0.25* 0.26* 0.23* 0.25* 0.26*
Percent Matching 46 52 49 54 52 47 44
Right binomial identified as no pref. LC 14 5 6 5 8 5 10
Right binomial identified as left LC 1 0 0 0 1 0 0
Left binomial identified as right LC 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
Left binomial identified as no pref. LC 1 7 7 4 3 9 4
No Pref. binomial identified as right LC 33 32 34 33 32 34 37
No Pref. binomial identified as left LC 3 3 3 3 3 5 3

Note. LC = latent class; pref. = preference;

poor strength of agreement;

*

fair strength of agreement