Table 3.

Concordance (in Percent) Between Hand Preference Group Assignment According to the Monthly “Fagard” Task (Nine Presentations and +/− 0.5 decision) and Latent Class Analysis Based on “Michel” Task (32 Presentations)

Infant’s Age in Months	8	9	10	11	12	13	14
Kappa, test of agreement	0.09†	0.14†	0.11†	0.09†	0.09†	0.05†	−.02†
Percent Matching	51	53	52	58	59	56	49
Right GLI identified as no pref. LC	12	5	13	12	10	15	19
Right GLI identified as left LC	0	1	0	0	1	1	1
Left GLI identified as right LC	7	4	1	0	1	1	2
Left GLI identified as no pref. LC	6	11	6	5	6	3	7
No Pref. GLI identified as right LC	21	23	25	23	21	19	17
No Pref. GLI identified as left LC	3	4	3	2	3	4	4

Note. LC = latent class; pref. = preference;

^†poor strength of agreement