Table I.
The Comparison of DockRank with the 29 CAPRI Scorers
| Scorer groups | Target 30 | Target 35 | Target 41 | Target 47 water | Target 50 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bonvin | 0 | 1 | 20 | 17 | 7 |
| 2 Zou | – | 0 | 12 | 16 | 13 |
| 3 DockRank | 0 | 0 | 19 | 13 | 1 |
| 4 Bates | 0 | 0 | 11 | 14 | 2 |
| 5 Weng | 0 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 3 |
| 6 Wang | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 10 |
| 7 Korkin | – | – | – | 17 | 2 |
| 8 Umeyama | – | – | – | 16 | – |
| 9 Xiao | – | – | 11 | – | 1 |
| 10 Camacho | – | – | – | 11 | – |
| Alexov | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| Bajaj | – | – | 0 | – | 1 |
| Elber | – | – | 4 | – | 5 |
| FireDock | – | 0 | – | – | – |
| Fernandez-Recio | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Gray | – | – | – | 0 | 2 |
| Grudinin | – | – | – | 0 | 2 |
| Haliloglu | – | – | 4 | 5 | 0 |
| Jiang | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| Jin | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| Kemp | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
| Kihara | – | – | 7 | 0 | – |
| Lee | – | 0 | – | – | – |
| Pal | – | – | – | – | 1 |
| SAMSON | – | – | 5 | – | – |
| Sternberg | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| Takeda-Shitaka | 0 | 0 | 10 | – | – |
| Vajda | 0 | – | – | – | – |
| Vakser | – | 0 | – | – | – |
| Wolfson | 0 | – | – | – | – |
Incorrect, acceptable, medium, and high-quality models are assigned with a score of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Dash denotes that a scorer did not submit any model for that target. The number in each cell is the sum of the scores of the 10 models selected by a scorer group. Ranks of the top 10 scorers are shown. All other scorers are listed alphabetically.