Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 3.
Published in final edited form as: Proteins. 2013 Oct 17;82(2):250–267. doi: 10.1002/prot.24370

Table II.

The Performance of DockRank on Cases That Have More Than Two Chains But Only a Subset of Chains Have Templates

Case ID (level of conformational changes) ClusPro2-BM3
ZDock3-BM3
PS-HomPPI Interface predictiona
DockRank ClusPro DockRank IRAD ZRank
Group 1 1GP2 (medium) Acceptable (1) Acceptable (85) Acceptable (133) Very Good for two chains
1K5D (medium) Medium (2) Acceptable (1) Medium (933) Acceptable (12) Medium (4295) Acceptable (84) Very Good for two chains
1JM0 (difficult) Acceptable (3168) NO RANKING Acceptable (44899) Very Good for two chains
1F51 (rigid-body) Acceptable (1) Acceptable (15) High (2) Medium (1) Acceptable (6) High (10918) Medium (1) Acceptable (13) High (15370) Medium (3) Acceptable (67) Good for one chain, ok for another chain.
Group II 1E6J (rigid-body) Acceptable (18) Acceptable (9) Medium (22169) Acceptable (7037) Medium (2) Acceptable (17) Medium (1) Acceptable (8) Good for one chain.
2FD6 (rigid-body) Medium (25373) Acceptable (9277) Medium (21) Acceptable (1) Medium (63) Acceptable (15) Ok for one chain.
Group III 2HMI (difficult) Acceptable (23048) NO RANKING Acceptable (272) Bad

According to the CARPI criteria, a docked model is classified into four categories: (1) a high-quality model, if its I–RMSD ≤ 1Å; (2) a medium quality model, if its I–RMSD ≤ 2Å; (3) an acceptable model if its I–RMSD ≤ 4Å.

The numbers in the parentheses are the ranks of the first model belonging to the corresponding category.