Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2014 Sep 27;25(12):2048–2059. doi: 10.1007/s13361-014-0981-1

Table 1.

Protein identification results from Saccharomyces cerevisiae datasets. Column 1 refers to the number of MS/MS spectra that were matched to a peptide below a 1% false-discovery rate, as estimated by Percolator. Column 2 lists the number of protein identifications for each instrument/method, along with a false-discovery rate at the protein level, estimated by a reverse-database strategy. Column 3 lists the percentage of all identified proteins found by a particular instrument/method combination. The group of columns marked “Percent overlap” lists percent of proteins in instrument/method row found by instrument/method column. For example, 74.3% of the proteins found in Velos DDA were also found in LTQ DDA.

Number
of
matched
MS/MS
spectra
Number
of
proteins
identified;
protein
FDR

(Total =
3335)
Percentage
of all
identified
proteins
Percent overlap
LTQ
DDA
IF-
LTQ
DDA
Velos
DDA
LTQ
DIA
IF-
LTQ
DIA
Velos
DIA
LTQ
DDA
74900 1791;
6.6%
53.7 77.2 78.7 81.3 83.8 81.8
IF-LTQ
DDA
92246 1783;
8.2%
53.5 77.1 78.8 81.0 84.2 81.3
Velos
DDA
142135 1895;
11.7%
56.8 74.3 74.5 77.4 80.7 78.2
LTQ
DIA
20028 2094;
3.2%
62.8 69.0 68.9 69.7 86.7 79.8
IF-LTQ
DIA
25600 2321;
3.5%
69.6 64.2 64.6 65.6 78.3 79.4
Velos
DIA
33913 2146;
4.3%
64.3 68.1 67.8 69.1 78.2 86.2