Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 20;2015:831285. doi: 10.1155/2015/831285

Table 1.

Studies on management of mesh related complications after incontinence and prolapse surgeries.

Author Trial Number of patients Mesh Complications Median time to revision Management Concomitant procedure Follow-up
Abbot et al.
2014 [17]
RT 347 (49.9% MUS; 25.6% TVM or CSP; 24.2% combination) Various 30% dyspareunia  
42.7% mesh erosion  
34.6% pelvic pain  
77% grade 3 or 4 (reoperation) complication
5.8 mos (0–65.2 mos) (1) Trimming of mesh/partial excision (50.9%)    
(2) Release of mesh arms (18.1%)    
(3) Complete intravaginal mesh excision (26.9%)    
(4) Recurrent prolapse treatment (23.2%)    
(5) Recurrent incontinence treatment (14.8%)    
(6) Other surgeries (20.1%)    
(7) Initial conservative treatment (23%)    
60% ≥2 interventions
MUS

Agnew et al.
2012 [18]
RT 63 MUS Various synthetics (67% monofilament TVT, 17% TOT) 100% voiding dysfunction 12.4 mos (1 week–8 yrs) (1) Simple sling division (73%)    
(2) Partial excision of sling (21%)    
(3) Concomitant procedure to prevent Re-SUI (4/63)
Burch, MUS Persistent voiding dysfunction  
(1) 10.9%; (2) 7.7%; (3) 50% (P = 0.09)  
Subsequent surgery for recurrent SUI  
(1) 2.2%; (2) 23.1%; (3) 0% (P = 0.04)  
De novo urgency  
(1) 10.9%; (2) 15.4%; (3) 25% (P = 0.51)

Blaivas et al.
2013 [19]
RT 47 MUS Type 1 76%  
Types 2–3 23%
OAB (70%)  
SUI (55%)  
Recurrent UTI (21%)  
Pelvic pain/dysuria (34%)  
Obstructive symptoms (9%)  
Vaginal extrusion (9%)
2 yrs (1 mos–8 yrs) (1) Sling excision + urethrolysis (34%)  
(2) Sling excision + urethral reconstruction (including fistula repair) + autologous fascial sling (30%)  
(3) Sling incision (21%)  
(4) Partial cystectomy (10%)  
(5) Ureteroneocystostomy (4%)
MUS 2 yrs (0.25–12 yrs)  
Successful treatment 72%  
28% recurrent surgery  
refractory pain (19%), mesh extrusion (17%), and OAB (8%)

Costantini et al.
2011 [20]
RT 12 (12/179, 6.7%) mesh erosion after abdominal CSP 11 PP, 1 Gore-Tex 100% mesh erosion  
41% vaginal bleeding  
33% asymptomatic  
17% dyspareunia  
17% infection (1x Gore-Tex)
22.9 mos (2–66 mos) (1) Antibiotics and local estrogen (100%)  
(2) Vaginal (partial) mesh resection (83%)  
(3) Abdominal resection (17%)  
(4) Endoscopic (8%)
57 mos (18–120 mos)  
(1) All needed surgery  
(3) Recurrent cystocele  
(4) Fistula, abdominal revision

Davis et al.
2012 [21]
RT 12 TVT PP 100% mesh erosion 59 mos (7–144 mos) Endoscopic holmium: YAG laser excision (100%) 65.5 mos (6–134 mos)  
33% second laser excision  
17% surgery for recurrent SUI  
8% (1 patient) abdominal mesh resection

Firoozi et al.
2012 [22]
RT 23 TVM for POP Various PP Vaginal/pelvic pain (39%), dyspareunia (39%), vaginal mesh extrusion/exposure (26%), urinary incontinence (35%), recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (22%), bladder mesh perforation (22%), rectal mesh perforation (4%), ureteral perforation injury (4%), and vesicovaginal fistula (9%) 10 mos (1–27 mos) (1) Transvaginal excision (90%)  
(2) Transvaginal/endoscopic (5%)  
(3) Transrectal/transperineal (5%)  
(4) Concomitant POP/SUI repair (45%)
TVM, MUS 3 mos  
14% UTI  
4.3% collagen injection for Re-SUI  
4.3% PFT for perineal pain

Greiman and Kielb 2012 [23] RT 28 (28/118, 23%) MUS PP Intravesical sling (4%), extruded vaginal mesh (93%), obstructive voiding symptoms (78%), dyspareunia (42%), and vaginal bleeding (21%) 15 mos (1) Sling loosening, incision in the midline  
(2) If mesh erosion >1 cm a resection
11% reoperation for mesh extrusion, no other complications

Hammett et al.
2014 [24]
RT 57 patients (26 MUS, 23 TVM, and 9 intraperitoneal prolapse CSP) Various PP 100% mesh erosion with pelvic pain (55.9%), dyspareunia (54.4%), and vaginal discharge (30.9%). (1) Vaginal mesh excision (91%)  
(2) Abdominal resection (all CSP, n = 9/15, 40%)
6 weeks  
57% symptoms completely resolved  
12% required more than 1 surgery for mesh excision  
(1) 9% UTI  
(2) 4.5% cardiopulmonal complications; 18% sepsis; 45% wound infection

Hampel et al.
2009 [25]
RT 48 MUS (44 TVT, 4 TOT) Various PP De novo urge (65%), mesh erosion (21%), dyspareunia (19%), UTI (35%), and fistula (6%) (1) Partial mesh resection (trans-/suburethral, 23%)  
(2) Self-catheterisation (23%)  
(3) Botox/neuromodulation (27%)  
(4) Fascia plastic (10%)  
(5) Complete abdominal-vaginal mesh resection (8%)  
(6) Urinary diversion (2%)  
(7) Fistula repair (6%)  
(8) Conservative treatment (25%)
42% symptoms completely resolved

Kasyan et al.
2014 [15]
RT 152 TVM Prolift (Gynecare), PP Erosions (21%), dyspareunia (11%), mesh shrinkage (4.4%), pelvic abscess (2.7%), and fistula (1.3%) (1) Conservative treatment with local oestrogen  
(2) Partial/total mesh excision

Nguyen et al.
2012 [26]
RT 82 MUS (2.2%) Various (1) Sling loosening or transaction for voiding dysfunction (60%)  
(2) Excision for vaginal mesh exposure 30 (36%)  
(3) Excision for pain (1.2%)  
(4) Excision for urethral erosion (1.2%)  
(5) Drainage of retropubic hematoma (1.2%)
MUS, colporrhaphy, and CSP

Abdel-Fattah et al. 2006 [16] RT 34 TVM (2.2%) Various (1) Excision for vaginal mesh exposure (85%)  
(2) Excision of vaginal suture (6%)  
(3) Biologic graft reoperation (12%)  
(4) Drainage hematoma/abscess (6%)  
(5) Bowel resection for obstruction (3%)

Padmanabhan
et al. 2012 [27]
RT 85 (MUS, TVM) Various PP Perforation of urethra (14%), bladder (36%), and vagina (50%) (1) Vaginal excision (14%)  
(2) Lower urinary tract excision (47%)  
(3) Partial cystectomy (21%)  
(4) Urethroplasty (21%)
Subjective cure in 75% and improvement in 21% SUI (6.6–12.5%)

Renezeder
et al. 2011 [28]
RT 118 (80% MUS, 20% TVM) Various PP (88% type 1) De novo urgency (46.6%), dyspareunia (41.5%), recurrent UTI (39.0%), mesh erosion (37%), and vaginal bleeding (9.3%) 27 mos (1–89 mos) (1) Tissue patch covering (17.8%)  
(2) Partial removal (65.3%)  
(3) Complete removal per laparotomy (12.7%)  
(4) Bone stabilization (0.8%)  
(5) Excision of granulation tissue (3.4%)
8 weeks  
45.5% urgency

Ridgeway et al. 2008 [29] RT 19 TVM Monofilament PP Chronic pain (31%), dyspareunia (31%), recurrent pelvic organ prolapse (42%), mesh erosion (63%), and vesicovaginal fistula (16%) Partial tailored vaginal mesh resection with concomitant procedures Burch, MUS 33 weeks (16–75 weeks)  
16% UTI  
5% hematoma  
21% persistent symptoms

Rouprêt et al. 2010 [30] RT 38 TVT PP Mesh erosion/extrusion (42%), pelvic pain (39%), and obstruction (18%) (1) Laparoscopic (97%)  
(2) Laparoscopic + vaginal (3%)
38 mos (2–80)  
Healing and pain release (100%)  
Recurrent SUI (66%)

Shah et al.
2013 [31]
RT 21 MUS Polypropylene, type I Urethral perforation (67%), bladder perforation (33%), fistula (19%), vaginal pain (67%), urgency (29%), incontinence (38%), obstruction (33%), dyspareunia (19%), and hematuria (24%) 15.5 mos (1–60 mos) (near) Total mesh excision, urinary tract reconstruction, and concomitant pubovaginal sling with autologous rectus fascia MUS, urethroplasty 22 mos (6–98 mos)  
Continence (81%)  
Incisional seroma (9.5%)  
Additional procedures (36%)  
UTI (9.5%)  
Pelvic pain (9.5%)  
dyspareunia 9.5%

RT: retrospective trial; PT: prospective trial; MUS: midurethral sling; TVM: transvaginal mesh; TVT: tension-free vaginal tape; TOT: transobturator tape; CSP: colposacropexy; PP: polypropylene.