Table 2.
Exercise Group |
Health & Wellness group |
Unadjusted | Adjusted for Education and Parity |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | OR1 | 95% CI | p-value | OR1 | 95% CI | p- value |
|
Gestational diabetes mellitus | 12 | 9.7 | 19 | 15.0 | 0.61 | (0.28, 1.32) | 0.21 | 0.60 | (0.27, 1.32) | 0.20 |
Impaired glucose tolerance | 17 | 13.7 | 24 | 18.9 | 0.68 | (0.35, 1.34) | 0.27 | 0.64 | (0.31, 1.29) | 0.21 |
Abnormal glucose screen | 37 | 29.8 | 42 | 33.1 | 0.86 | (0.51, 1.47) | 0.58 | 0.86 | (0.49, 1.48) | 0.58 |
mean | SD | mean | SD | β | SE | p-value | β | SE | p- value |
|
Screening glucose value (mg/dL) | 117.8 | 26.5 | 119.7 | 33.7 | −1.95 | 3.86 | 0.61 | −1.76 | 3.98 | 0.66 |
Logistic regression was used to model the odds of GDM and other measure of glucose intolerance in the exercise group versus the health and wellness group.