Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 30.

Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2015 Feb 4;34(9):1605–1620. doi: 10.1002/sim.6440

Table 1.

Logistic Regression Results for BV Status (Y) on 904 Women at the 4^th HERS Visit.

Variable	β̂ (StdErr)	$\hat{O R}$ (95% CI)
Ideal Analysis^a
Trichomoniasis (+ vs. −)	0.88 (0.19)	2.41 (1.66, 3.50)
Age (Years)	−0.04 (0.01)	0.96 (0.94, 0.98)
Race (Black vs. Others)	0.76 (0.16)	2.15 (1.57, 2.92)
HIV Risk Cohort (IDU vs. Sexual)	0.31 (0.15)	1.37 (1.03, 1.83)
HIV Status (+ vs. −)	0.22 (0.15)	1.25 (0.93, 1.69)
Naive Analysis^b
Trichomoniasis (+ vs. −)	1.24 (0.27)	3.44 (2.03, 5.84)
Age (Years)	−0.05 (0.01)	0.95 (0.93, 0.98)
Race (Black vs. Others)	0.69 (0.18)	1.99 (1.40, 2.83)
HIV Risk Cohort (IDU vs. Sexual)	0.90 (0.17)	2.45 (1.74, 3.45)
HIV Status (+ vs. −)	−0.31 (0.17)	0.73 (0.52, 1.03)

^a

LAB BV vs Culture Trichomoniasis, adjusting for age, race, HIV risk cohort and HIV status.

^b

CLIN BV vs Wet Mount Trichomoniasis, adjusting for age, race, HIV risk cohort and HIV status.