Table 2.
Comparisons of Ae. aegypti captured by BG sentinel traps baited with different odor baits relative to the control (BG sentinel trap baited with the BG commercial lure) in Experiment 1 in Busia and Kilifi
| Site | Treatment | IRR (95%CI) | P value | Site | Treatment | IRR (95%CI) | P value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Busia | Blend 3 | 0.75(0.43-1.55) | 0.40 | Kilifi | Blend 3 | 0.91(0.35-2.41) | 0.858 |
| Busia | Blend 2 | 1.3(0.61-2.75) | 0.49 | Kilifi | Blend 2 | 1.23(0.47-3.24) | 0.665 |
| Busia | Blend 1 | 0.62(0.29-1.35) | 0.23 | Kilifi | Blend 1 | 0.61(0.23—1.6) | 0.307 |
| Busia | Volunteer 1 feet odors | 1.12(0.53-2.4) | 0.76 | Kilifi | Volunteer 2 feet odors | 1.09(0.42-4-2.8) | 0.849 |
| Busia | Volunteer 1 trunk odors | 1.01(0.48-2.15) | 0.97 | Kilifi | Volunteer 2 trunk odors | 0.91(0.35—2.41) | 0.858 |
Estimated incidence rate ratio (IRR); confidence interval (CI) and corresponding P-values based on comparison to the control (BG lure baited trap) following generalized linear model (GLM) with negative binomial error structure and log link in R 3.1.0 software. The IRR for the control is 1; values above this indicate better performance while values below indicate under performance relative to the control. Blend 1; propionic acid and 3-methylbutyric acid, Blend 2; nonanal + octanal. Blend 3; Blend 1 + Blend 2.