Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Depress Anxiety. 2015 Feb 17;32(5):316–324. doi: 10.1002/da.22347

TABLE 2.

Associations between partner violence and women’s new onset of depression

Time Risk factors Model 1 unadjusted
Model 2 adjusted for child maltreatment
Model 3 adjusted for all confounders
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Panel A
Risk associated with exposure to violence
T2 Partner violence 2.59 1.67–4.00 2.12 1.35–3.33 1.72 1.07–2.77
Childhood maltreatment 2.28 1.45–3.60 2.01 1.25–3.22
T3 Partner violence 2.66 1.81–3.91 2.25 1.51–3.37 1.61 1.05–2.48
Childhood maltreatment 3.27 2.19–4.89 2.64 1.74–4.01
Panel B
Cumulative risk associated with exposure to violence
T2 Either 2.71 1.59–4.59 2.25 1.31–3.89
Both 4.80 2.63–8.75 3.43 1.79–6.57
T3 Either 2.78 1.73–4.49 2.09 1.27–3.44
Both 7.38 4.35–12.51 4.30 2.43–7.60
Panel C
Risk associated with a variety index of abusive acts
T2 Limited (1 or 2) 0.31 0.67–2.55 1.16 0.59–2.29 1.06 0.53–2.10
Moderate range (3 to 6) 2.25 1.25–4.07 1.99 1.09–3.63 1.65 0.88–3.09
Wide range (≥ 7) 4.71 2.70–8.24 3.44 1.91–6.18 2.53 1.33–4.82
T3 Limited (1 or 2) 2.20 1.28–3.79 1.96 1.12–3.42 1.70 0.96–3.02
Moderate range (3 to 6) 2.75 1.62–4.65 2.41 1.40–4.14 1.69 0.95–3.00
Wide range (≥ 7) 4.33 2.56–7.34 3.48 2.01–6.04 1.88 1.02–3.47

Note: Model 3; Panel A controlled for childhood maltreatment, socioeconomic deprivation, antisocial personality, and young motherhood. Model 3; Panel B controlled for socioeconomic deprivation, antisocial personality, and young motherhood. Comparison groups are the absence of both childhood maltreatment and partner violence for Panel B and the absence of partner violence for Panel C. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence intervals.