Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Nephrol. 2008 Nov-Dec;21(6):797–807.

Table 2.

Performance of Cystatin C and Creatinine-Based Estimating Equations Developed in 3134 People with CKD

Model Difference
Percent Difference
P30 (95% CI) RMSE (95% CI)
Median (95% CI) IQR (95% CI) Median (95% CI) IQR (95% CI)
External Validation (n=438)

1. Cystatin C −3 (−3, −2) 8 (7, 9) −10 (−13, −7) 31 (28, 36) 73 (72,74) 0.264 (0.239, 0.289)
2. Cystatin C, age, sex, and race −2 (−2, −1) 8 (7, 9) −6 (−8, −4) 30 (26, 32) 79 (78,80) 0.248 (0.223, 0.271)
3. Creatinine, age, sex, and race 2 (1,3) 8 (7, 9) 7 (4,9) 25 (22, 29) 84 (83,85) 0.229 (0.210, 0.247)
4. Cysatin C and creatinine, age, sex, and race 0 (0,1) 7 (6, 8) 1 (−1,3) 22 (20, 25) 90 (89,91) 0.193 (0.174, 0.211)

Note: The difference is calculated as measured GFR - estimated GFR. Units are in mL/min/1.73 m2. Percent difference calculated as (measured GFR - estimated GFR)/measured GFR, and units are in percent. Median values measure bias and IQRs measure precision. To convert GFR from mL/min/1.73 m2 to mL/s/1.73 m2, multiply by 0.01666. Used with permission [36].

Abbreviations: P30, percentage of estimated GFR within 30% of mGFR; IQR, interquartile range; RMSE, root mean square error; CI, confidence interval; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration; mGFR, measured glomerular filtration rate.

*

The 95% CI around the estimates of bias, IQR, P30, and RMSE provides the range of values likely to include parameter in 95% of circumstances. Comparison of CIs around any metric for 2 equations provides information about difference between them. If the 2 metrics were the same, the chance that the upper and lower bounds of the CIs would overlap is less than 5%; therefore, it can be concluded that they are statistically significantly different.