Table 4.
Adjusted regression models for the logit of the proportion of women in union, Mexico 2000
| Age 15–19 |
Age 20–24 |
Age 25–29 |
Age 30–34 |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | (SE) | B | (SE) | B | (SE) | B | (SE) | |
| Panel A: Ordinary least squares | ||||||||
| Mean sex ratio | 0.795 | (0.252) | 1.371 | (0.224) | 1.475 | (0.243) | 1.540 | (0.283) |
| Mean education | −0.220 | (0.034) | −0.149 | (0.021) | −0.117 | (0.021) | −0.050 | (0.023) |
| Mean level of migration | −1.290 | (0.406) | −0.592 | (0.350) | −0.849 | (0.347) | −0.816 | (0.391) |
| Constant | −0.582 | 0.197 | 0.787 | 0.761 | ||||
| R2 | 0.197 | 0.288 | 0.274 | 0.177 | ||||
| Panel B: Random effects | ||||||||
| Mean sex ratio | 0.916 | (0.175) | 0.977 | (0.185) | 1.236 | (0.201) | 1.248 | (0.204) |
| Mean education | −0.218 | (0.028) | −0.139 | (0.022) | −0.116 | (0.021) | −0.055 | (0.020) |
| Mean level of migration1 | −1.056 | (0.249) | ||||||
| Constant | −0.731 | 0.482 | 0.990 | 1.061 | ||||
| R2 | 0.608 | 0.701 | 0.660 | 0.532 | ||||
| Panel C: Fixed effects | ||||||||
| Mean sex ratio | 0.855 | (0.186) | 0.786 | (0.198) | 1.053 | (0.216) | 1.060 | (0.216) |
| Mean education | −0.214 | (0.037) | −0.134 | (0.029) | −0.114 | (0.028) | −0.055 | (0.026) |
| Mean level of migration | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Constant | −0.883 | 0.402 | 0.941 | 1.042 | ||||
| R2 | 0.667 | 0.725 | 0.681 | 0.562 | ||||
1
The coefficient estimate for migration in the random-effects model reflects the total effect of migration across all four age groups.
–
= not estimated in model.
Source: As for Table 1.