Skip to main content
. 2015 May 4;10(5):e0125669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125669

Fig 3. KeGFR prediction of DGF compared with unadjusted eGFR and sCr.

Fig 3

A: estimated kinetic GFR using serum creatinine (KeGFRsCr) compared with serum creatinine (sCr) and unadjusted estimate of GFR using sCr (eGFRsCr). Figures show area under receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals for prediction of DGF at 4h (n = 56), 8h (n = 52) and 12h (n = 52). Asterisk (*) denotes p < 0.05 for the comparison with the AUC for sCr at the same time.