Table 2. Comparison of Results from CCD and MVN Procedures.
| Intercept | Age | Trauma | Age*Trauma | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Est | P | Est | P | Est | P | Est | P | |
| CCD | 27.1 | <.0001 | -0.17 | 0.04 | -1.37 | 0.077 | 0.24 | 0.001 |
| JAV | 27.2 | <.0001 | -0.17 | 0.08 | -1.35 | 0.173 | 0.24 | 0.002 |
| PSI | 25.7 | <.0001 | -0.06 | 0.52 | -0.004 | 0.996 | 0.13 | 0.047 |
| IARM | 25.7 | <.0001 | -0.06 | 0.51 | -0.004 | 0.996 | 0.13 | 0.044 |
| CC | 27.4 | <.0001 | -0.21 | 0.06 | -1.31 | 0.179 | 0.23 | 0.002 |
CCD: Correct Conditional Distribution
JAV: Just Another Variable
PSI: Passive Imputation
IARM: MVN Impute All Recalculate by Multiplication
CC: Complete Case analysis