Skip to main content
. 2014 Dec 5;473(6):2056–2066. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4084-x

Table 2.

Comparison of the CT measurement values between control and hip dysplasia groups

Parameters Control (n = 40 hips) Hip dysplasia (n = 70 hips) p value
Acetabular opening angle
 Acetabular anteversion angle (°) 21 (6.7; 11–37) 25 (5.5; 10–37) < 0.014
 Acetabular inclination angle (°) 39 (3.2; 33–46) 49 (3.8; 38–61) < 0.001
 Cranial anteversion angle (°) 12 (8.6; −8.4 to 27) 11 (8.8; −6.8 to 31) 0.537
Acetabular coverage
 Anterior acetabular sector angle (°) 57 (9.4; 38–74) 42 (6.9; 27–55) < 0.001
 Superior acetabular sector angle (°) 123 (4.6; 115–133) 99 (6.9; 87–114) < 0.001
 Posterior acetabular sector angle (°) 99 (7; 80–112) 91 (6.8; 71–107) < 0.001
 Axial acetabular sector angle (°) 156 (9.9; 137–176) 133 (8.5; 112–153) < 0.001
Acetabular depth
 Coronal acetabular depth ratio (%) 300 (29; 243–361) 226 (40; 140–317) < 0.001
 Axial acetabular depth ratio (%) 441 (32; 378–519) 404 (39; 296–492) < 0.001
Innominate rotation angles < 0.001
 Superior iliac angle (°) 52 (6.5; 39–679) 58 (6.1; 45–68) < 0.001
 Inferior iliac angle (°) 70 (5.2; 61–82) 71 (4.1; 62–82) 0.028
 Ischiopubic angle (°) 28 (2.7; 22–34) 30 (2.8; 22–39) < 0.001
Acetabular floor to ischial wall distance (mm) 0.6 (3.0; −5.1 to 5.9) 0.6 (2.4; −5.0 to 5.6) 0.917

Values are presented as mean (SD; range).