Table 1.
Ref. | Type of study | No. of total patients | No. of older patients/age (yr) | Endpoint | Outcome [HR (95%CI)] |
Iwashyna et al[23] | Population-based cohort study (SEER-Medicare) | 3357 | 3357 (100%)/≥ 70 | 5-FU vs observation: | OS: 0.73 (0.65-0.82) |
OS | |||||
Sargent et al[24] | Pooled analysis of 7 randomized phase III trials | 3351 | 506 (15%)/≥ 70 | 5-FU/LV vs observation: | (1) TTR: 0.68 (0.60-0.76; P < 0.01) |
(1) TTR | (2) OS: 0.76 (0.68-0.85; P < 0.01) | ||||
(2) OS | |||||
Sanoff et al[26] | Retrospective, database analysis (SEER-Medicare, NSYSCR, CanCONS, NCCN) | 5489 | 5489 (100%)/≥ 75 | OS in stage III: | (1) 0.60 (0.53-0.68) |
(1) CTx vs no CTx | (2) SEER-Medicare: 0.84 (0.69-1.04) | ||||
(2) Oxaliplatin-based vs non-oxaliplatin regimens | NYSCR: 0.82 (0.51-1.33) | ||||
McCleary et al[27] | ACCENT group analysis in stage II/III | 14528 | 2575 (22%)/≥ 70 | 5-FU/LV or oral 5-FU vs combination regimens: DFS, OS, TTR in (1) older and (2) younger patients | (1) DFS: 1.05 (0.94-1.19; P = 0.09) |
OS: 1.08 (0.95-1.23; P = 0.05) | |||||
TTR: 1.06 (0.93-1.22; P = 0.36) | |||||
(2) DFS: 0.89 (0.80-0.99; P < 0.01) | |||||
TTR: 0.88 (0.79-0.98; P = 0.02) | |||||
OS: 1.08 (0.95-1.23; P = 0.04)1 | |||||
Yothers et al[28] | Exploratory subset analysis of updated results of NSABP C-07 trial | 2409 | 396 (16%)/≥ 70 | 5-FU/LV vs oxaliplatin plus 5-FU/LV: | |
(1) DFS | (1) DFS: 1.03 (0.77-1.36; P = 0.87) | ||||
(2) OS | (2) OS: 1.18 (0.86-1.62; P = 0.30) | ||||
Tournigand et al[29] | Subgroup analysis of MOSAIC trial for stage II disease and elderly patients | 2246 | 315 (14%)/70-75 | 5-FU/LV vs FOLFOX4: | |
(1) DFS | (1) DFS: 0.93 (0.64-1.35; P = 0.73) | ||||
(2) OS | (2) OS: 1.10 (0.73-1.65; P = 0.66) |
The benefit of adding oxaliplatin was restricted to patients younger than 70 years for OS. CTx: Chemotherapy; DFS: Disease-free survival; 5-FU/LV: 5-Fluorouracil/leucovorin; OS: Overall survival; TTR: Time to recurrence.