Skip to main content
. 2015 May 7;21(17):5336–5344. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i17.5336

Table 4.

Univariate and multivariate analysis for overall survival after surgery using Cox relative risk

Variable Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
RR (95%CI) P value RR (95%CI) P value
PDH expression in tumor (positive vs negative) 0.552 (0.462-0.658) < 0.0011 0.608 (0.504-0.734) < 0.0011
PDH expression in NNM (positive vs negative) 0.830 (0.699-0.987)  0.035 0.869 (0.727-1.039) 0.123
Age (≥ 60 yr vs < 60 yr) 1.446 (1.030-2.032)  0.033 1.447 (1.010-2.073) 0.044
Tumor size (< 4 cm vs ≥ 4 cm) 2.297 (1.505-3.504) < 0.0011 1.492 (0.956-2.329) 0.078
Depth of invasion (Tis-1 vs T2-4) 5.114 (1.889-13.843)  0.0011 1.683 (0.567-4.995) 0.348
Lauren grade (intestinal-type vs diffuse-type) 1.978 (1.396-2.803) < 0.0011 1.574 (1.081-2.292) 0.0181
TNM Stage (0-I vs II-IV) 1.809 (1.504-2.176) < 0.0011 1.512 (1.191-1.920) 0.0011
Lymph node metastasis (positive vs negative) 3.146 (1.989-4.977) < 0.0011 1.733 (1.061-2.830) 0.0281
Lymphatic invasion (positive vs negative) 2.041 (1.424-2.924) < 0.0011 1.271 (0.875-1.847) 0.208
Histological type (differentiated vs undifferentiated) 1.460 (1.033-2.063)  0.032 1.058 (0.667-1.678) 0.811
1

Significant difference. RR and 95%CI were assessed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. RR: Relative risk.