Skip to main content
. 2014 Sep 20;24(5):591–602. doi: 10.1007/s00787-014-0613-0

Table 2.

Post-treatment Group-specific mean and response rates

Estimated mean or rate (95 % CI)a Effect sizes CBT vs. SRT (95 % CI)b, c
Continued CBT Sertraline
Primary outcomes
 CY-BOCS total scored 13.64 (10.96–16.32) 11.65 (7.88–15.42) −0.29 (−0.85 to −0.27)
 CY-BOCS <16e 0.50 (0.33–0.67) 0.45 (0.27–0.65) 0.10 (−0.72 to 0.52)
Secondary outcomes
 COIS-R parent reportf 17.20 (11.74–22.67) 15.50 (8.86–22.14) −0.11 (−0.67 to 0.45)
 COIS-R child reportf 15.39 (11.05–19.73) 8.44 (2.72–14.17) −0.55 (−1.12 to −0.02)
 CY-BOCS <11g 0.32 (0.18–0.51) 0.27 (0.13–0.48) −0.22 (−0.41 to 0.85)
 30 % reductionh 0.36 (0.21–0.54) 0.45 (0.27–0.65) 0.13 (−0.81 to 0.55)

aFor CY-BOCS total score and COIS-R estimated mean score at week 30 from the fitted multilevel model. For the responder status, the estimated rate of response at week 30

bFor CY-BOCS total score and COIS-R, between-groups difference in estimated mean score at session 30. For the responder status, between-groups difference in rate at week 30

cNegative effect size suggests that SRT was more effective and positive effect size suggests that continued CBT was more effective

dCY-BOCS total score range from 0 to 40 with larger scores reflecting more OCD symptoms

eCY-BOCS <16 reflects participants that obtained CY-BOCS total score of 15 or below at week 30

fCOIS-R total score range from 0 to 99 with larger scores reflecting more OCD-related functional

g CY-BOCS < 11 reflects participants that obtained CY-BOCS total score of 10 or below at week 30

h30 % reduction of CY-BOCS total score from week 13 to week 30