Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 10;112(15):255–261. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0255

Table 1b. Further studies found by the updating process.

Study Indications, design, and methods Results and conclusions Do the findings support the conclusion? EL Conflict of interest?
Tanikawa
2013
(26)
Prospective, two-armed, randomized, blinded trial; CAL vs. AFT in 18 patients with craniofacial microsomia Method: CT volumetry Follow-up: Up to 12 months Significantly better volume retention in the CAL group; 4 dropouts (2 per group); CAL is safe, effective, and superior to AFT High methodological quality; sole study known to us showing an advantage for CAL for a special indication. Conclusion about safety not supported by findings. Limitations: low number of patients, high dropout rate, not generalizable to common indications II–III No financial conflict of inerest
Perez-Cano
2012
(11)
Prospective, one-armed, multicenter trial: CAL in 71 women after breast-conserving treatmentMethods: Clinical examination, LENT-SOMA, assessment of pt. satisfaction on a 6-point scale, MRI Follow-up: Up to 12 Monate 4 dropouts, repeat procedures in 24 pts., MRI abandoned for inadequate sensitivity; pts. and physicians generally satisfied; bone metastasis (1 pt.), cyst formation (10 pts.);CAL is safe and effective Conclusion not at all supported by findings; marked methodological deficiencies IV Technical and financial support of the device manufacturer
Peltoniemi
2013
(27)
Prospective, two-armed, non-randomized trial; 18 patients underwent CAL or AFT for breast augmentation Method: MRI volumetry Follow-up: Up to 6 months No significant intergroup difference; one case of cyst formation in each group; trial terminated because of lack of advantage from CAL; AFT quicker, cheaper, and theoretically safer with at least equivalent outcomes The conclusion is reasonable, although the trial groups were small III No conflict of interest

AFT, autologous fat transfer; CAL, cell-assisted lipotransfer; EL, evidence level; LENT-SOMA, late effects on normal tissues, subjective/objective management analysis (interdisciplinary assessment of long-term oncologic treatment outcomes); MSC, mesenchymal stem cells; pt./pts., patient(s)