Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 30;3:e926. doi: 10.7717/peerj.926

Table 1. Summary statistics calculated in DnaSP.

None of the Tajima’s D values were significant.

Collection site n H Hd Pi Tajima’s D Fu’s Fs
SAND 11 11 1 0.01640 −0.95411 −4.172
TR 9 9 1 0.01749 −0.30109 −2.642
WH 12 11 0.985 0.01750 −0.56516 −2.648
RWU 11 8 0.945 0.01222 −0.01230 −0.431
VA 11 10 0.982 0.01886 −0.27640 −1.849
SC 12 11 0.985 0.01508 −0.31326 −3.116
SI 7 7 1 0.01725 −0.23160 −1.463
SA 7 7 1 0.01041 −1.43806 −2.449
SK 7 7 1 0.01717 −0.63213 −1.471
KL 14 14 1 0.01750 −0.64068 −6.227
TF 7 6 0.952 0.00792 −0.46339 −1.188
Total 108 93 0.996 0.01789 −1.70904 −109.686

Notes.

N
number of individuals
H
number of haplotypes
Hd
haplotype diversity
Pi
nucleotide diversity
SAND
Sandwich, Massachusetts
TR
Truro, Massachusetts
WH
Woods Hole, Massachusetts
RWU
Bristol, Rhode Island
VA
Gloucester Point, Virginia
SC
Charleston, South Carolina
SI
Sapelo Island, Georgia
SA
Savannah, Georgia
SK
Summerland Key, Florida
KL
Key Largo, Florida
TF
Tampa, Florida