Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2015 Jan;298(1):145–167. doi: 10.1002/ar.23073

TABLE 4.

Muscle forces, bite forces, occlusal pressures,a and mechanical advantageb in the finite element models

Specimen Total
muscle
force (N)
P3 bite
force (N)
M2 bite
force (N)
P3 occlusal
area (mm2)
M2 occlusal
area (mm2)
P3 occlusal
pressure
(MPa)
M2 occlusal
pressure
(MPa)
P3 mechanical
advantage
M2 mechanical
advantage
OH 5 5,176 2,053 3,895 185.5 361.2 11.1 10.8 0.40 0.75
Sts5 2,893 1,178 1,786 118.7 214.2 9.9c 8.3c 0.41 0.62
PC1− 2,980 1,107 1,522 76.7 105.0 14.4 14.5 0.37 0.51
PC1+ 2,540 818 1,251 78.3 118.5 10.4 10.6 0.32 0.49
PC2− 2,536 999 1,481 81.6 96.9 12.2 15.3 0.39 0.58
PC2+ 2,408 924 1,350 67.9 84.0 13.6 16.1 0.38 0.56
PC3− 3,268 1,244 1,779 80.5 93.5 15.4 15.8d 0.38 0.54
PC3+ 3,146 1,310 1,908 79.2 106.7 16.5 17.9 0.42 0.61
a

Occlusal pressure is calculated as bite force divided by the crown area of the tooth in question (mediodistal length times buccolingual breadth). Tooth dimensions of chimpanzees were measured on CT images, and should be considered approximate. Tooth dimension of fossil hominins were obtained from www.humanoriginsdatabase.org

b

Mechanical advantage is a measure of biomechanical efficiency, and can be calculated simply as the ratio of the bite force to the total muscle force. In other words, it is equivalent to the ratio of the force outputs to the force inputs.

c

Note that the tooth crown area data used to calculate pressure are derived from specimen Sts 52a, but that the corresponding bite force data are influenced strongly by the shape and configuration of specimen Sts 5. Thus, the resulting pressure data are heuristic.

d

Tooth area data were calculated from the better preserved right M2.