Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc. 2015 Apr 2;41:121–130. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.02.010

Table 5.

Temperament x Parental Monitoring Interactions in 9 Grade Predicting Substance Use Intentions in 9 Grade

b β t R2 ΔR2 df
Step l .179* 601
    Effortful Control −.64 −.23 −5.57*
    Parental Monitoring −.03 −.27 −6.71*
Step 2 .186* .007* 600
    Effortful Control X
    Parental Monitoring
.03 .08 2.30*

Step l .173* 601
    Negative Affectivity .49 .18 4.90*
    Parental Monitoring −.04 −.37 −10.05*
Step 2 .179* .006* 600
    Negative Affectivity X
    Parental Monitoring
−.02 −.08 −2.07*

Step 1 .234* 601
    Aggression .75 .30 7.69*
    Parental Monitoring −.03 −.26 −6.81*
Step 2 .245* .011* 600
    Aggression X −.03 −.11 −2.99*
    Parental Monitoring

Step l .185* 601
    Depressive Mood .55 .22 5.89*
    Parental Monitoring −.04 −.33 −8.85*
Step 2 .193* .009* 600
    Depressive Mood X
    Parental Monitoring
−.03 −.09 −2.52*

Note. All regression coefficients based on full model. Parental Monitoring is child reported. Effortful control, negative affectivity, aggression, depressive mood, and parental monitoring were grand-mean centered prior to analysis. Substance use intentions were log transformed and standardized prior to analysis.

*

p < .05.