Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Nov 17;41(3):787–806. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000040

Appendix Table B.

Mean visual search RT (ms) after the exclusion of trials in which an incorrect response was made to the concurrent working memory task.

B.1. Experiments 1, 4, and 5.
High-load No-load

Cue condition Valid/Rich Invalid/Sparse Valid/Rich Invalid/Sparse

Set size 8 12 16 8 12 16 8 12 16 8 12 16
Exp1 1036 1276 1489 1451 1862 2177 985 1213 1425 1289 1618 2126
Exp4A 1217 1471 1718 1500 1965 2263 903 1077 1288 1405 1827 2287
Exp4B 953 1155 1437 1253 1594 1972 880 1047 1284 1263 1655 2053
Exp5 1170 1501 1745 1478 1934 2215 938 1060 1342 1388 1818 2221
B.2. Experiments 2 and 3.
Cue condition High-load rich No-load rich Sparse

Set size 8 12 16 8 12 16 8 12 16
Exp2 High-load 1067 1316 1660 990 1430 1755 1252 1693 2043
Exp2 No-load 1056 1351 1700 1085 1307 1593 1208 1614 1993
Exp3 High-load 1072 1305 1562 1154 1338 1616 1285 1601 1993
Exp3 No-load 1089 1320 1575 1054 1283 1625 1238 1590 1940