Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Nov 17;41(3):787–806. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000040

Table 3.

Number of participants who made different recognition responses in Experiments 2 and 3. The total number of participants was 36.

Thought the target's location was random (N=15) Thought the target was more often in some places (N=21)
Quadrant identified as the high-probability locations No-load rich quad High-load rich quad Sparse quadrants No-load rich quad High-load rich quad Sparse quadrants
8 3 4 12 2 7