Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 24;5:357–368. doi: 10.1016/j.fob.2015.04.012

Table 5.

Summary of the tissue-specific adaptive responses to fasting in mice.

Tissues
Brain Eye Thymus Lung Heart Liver Stomach Kidney Spleen S.I. Colon S.M. Testis
Weight loss (wet gram) +++ ++ + + ++ ++ +
1. Ubiquitin–proteasome system
 Atrogin-1 (MAFbx) ++ ++ (F1) ++ +(F1) + + ++ + +++ (F1)
 MuRF1 (Trim63) +++ ++ (F1) ++ (F1) ND ++ (F1) ND ND ND ND +++ (F1)



2. Autophagy–lysosome system
 LC3b (Map1lc3b) ++ +(F1) +++ (F1) +(F1) + +(F1) ++ (F1) + (F1)
 p62 (Sqstm1) ++ +(F1) ++ (F1) + + + +(F1) ++ (F1)
 Lamp2 ++ down down



3. Amino acid response
 Asns + ++ +(F1)
 Trib3 +++ + down ++ +++ (F1) +
 Herpud1 +++ + +
 xCT (Slc7a11) +++ (F1) ND ND down ND
 Chop (Ddit3) down + down down down ++ (F1)



4. Nrf2 antioxidant system
 HO-1 down +++ +++ (F1) + + + ++ (F1)
 Gsta1 +++ + down +++ ND down



5. Amino acid transporter
 Slc38a2 (Sat2) ++ + down
 Slc7a5 (Lat1) down down +++
 Slc7a1 (Cat1) down ++ (F1)

Systemic responses to 1- or 2-day (water-only) fasting were evaluated. Changes in wet tissue weights were categorized into – (no significant change), + (18–19% decrease), ++ (31–42% decrease), or +++ (54.7% decrease). Gene expression changes were categorized into – (no significant change), down (significant down-regulation), +(1 < X (fold-induction) < 3 for Atrogin-1, MuRF1, HO-1, and Gsta1, and 1 < X < 2 for others), ++ (3 < X < 6 for Atrogin-1, MuRF1, HO-1, and Gsta1, and 2 < X < 3 for others), and +++ (6 < X for Atrogin-1, MuRF1, HO-1, and Gsta1, and 3 < X for others); when the maximal responses were observed in 1-day fasted mice, “(F1)” was labeled. “down” represents significant down-regulation at day 1 or 2 in gene expression. S.I., small intestine; S.M., skeletal (rectus femoris) muscle; ND, not detected.