Skip to main content
editorial
. 2008 Aug 22;1(5):279–284. doi: 10.1093/ndtplus/sfn136

Table 1.

Excluded articles after full assessment

Study ID Reason for exclusion
Besarab [7] Review
Paulson [8] Review
Sands [9] Review
Work [10] Review
Arbabzadah [11] Evaluation of AVG that clot despite online Qa surveillance and the outcome of radiological thrombectomy
Bosman [12] Study whether high dynamic venous pressure coincides with low AVG flow, measured by the ultrasound dilution technique
Cayco [13] Comparison of a surveillance programme based on dynamic venous pressure with a historical group during which no surveillance was applied, in relation to AVG thrombosis incidence
Cinat [14] Evaluation of the patency, complications and predictive factors of patency for AVG
Dember [15] Comparison between prophylactic repair of AVG stenosis based on static venous pressure and repair at the time of thrombosis, in relation to graft survival
Dossabhoy [16] Replication of data from other study [36]
Frinak [17] Sensitivity and specificity of a dynamic venous access ratio test for access surveillance
Garland [18] Review (Qa measurement by ultrasound dilution the standard of care for access surveillance?)
Goldstein [19] Age of participants <18 years
Lumsden [20] Prospective randomized trial to compare patients who underwent PTA for AVG (stenosis >50%) with a control group that received no intervention, towards AVG survival. Surveillance tool: duplex ultrasound
Magnesco [21] Comparison of two online Qa measurement techniques
Maya [22] Comparison of outcomes of elective angioplasty between AVF and AVG
Neyra [23] Evaluation of the predictive value of the Qa decrease towards thrombosis risk
Plantinga [24] Effect of clinic vascular access monitoring practices towards clinical outcomes in haemodialysis patients
Roberts [25] Study towards the value of a surveillance programme based on measuring venous resistance, regarding AVG patency and survival
Safa [26] To determine the value of a haemodialysis graft surveillance programme in reducing the incidence of AVG thrombosis and prolonging graft patency by means of pre-emptive intervention (PTA) of graft-related stenoses (no online Qa surveillance applied)
Sands [27] Review
Sands [28] Effect of pre-emptive intervention towards access survival. No online Qa surveillance used
Singh [29] Comparison predictive accuracy static venous pressure, dynamic venous pressure and access flow in determining subsequent graft thrombosis
Tanuma [30] Evaluation of the long-term results of vascular access, in particular the effects of PTA
Tessitore [31] Predictive value of online Qa surveillance in AVF towards thrombosis, and sensitivity towards stenosis detection
Tonelli [32] Review

AVF = arteriovenous fistula; AVG = arteriovenous graft; Qa = vascular access flow.