Table 3.
Regulogger Efficiency With Different Genome Sets
| Genomes used for Regulogger | Average EfREG | Percentage of factors with EfREG ≥ 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Ecol, Ypes, Paer, Hinf, Vcho | 4.18 | 0.73 |
| Ecol, Ypes, Vcho, Hinf | 4.44 | 0.69 |
| Ecol, Ypes, Vcho, Psae | 4.22 | 0.71 |
| Ecol, Vcho, Hinf, Psae | 4.14 | 0.58 |
| Ecol, Ypes, Hinf, Psae | 3.68 | 0.71 |
| Ecol, Ypes, Vich | 4.92 | 0.65 |
| Ecol, Vich, Hinf | 4.49 | 0.54 |
| Ecol, Ypes, Hinf | 3.73 | 0.62 |
| Ecol, Ypes, Psae | 3.37 | 0.69 |
| Ecol, Vcho, Psae | 3.61 | 0.54 |
| Ecol, Hinf, Psae | 3.09 | 0.44 |
| Ecol, Ypes | 3.77 | 0.58 |
| Ecol, Vcho | 3.72 | 0.42 |
| Ecol, Hinf | 2.60 | 0.33 |
| Ecol, Psae | 1.95 | 0.31 |
The regulons of E. coli to which Regulogger was applied were obtained by performing a site search with the 48 matrices from the ECO reference set using a threshold score of P < 0.05. The average Regulogger efficiency (EfREG) was calculated as described in the text.