Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 15;21(Pt 3):600–612. doi: 10.1107/S1600577514003439

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Results from the data processing by the JIKOKU subprogram. (a) Determination of parameters in equation (1) by fitting the diffraction pattern of a cuboid-shaped copper oxide particle simultaneously recorded in the MPCCD-Octal (outside the white dotted box in the left-hand panel) and the MPCCD-Dual (inside the white dotted box in the right-hand panel) detectors. The experimental diffraction patterns are shown with those calculated from the determined values of the parameters (Table 2). The line profiles along positions A and B in the upper panels are shown in semi-log plots to emphasize the continuity in the borders between the experimental and theoretical data. The regions of theoretical prediction are indicated by the gray-colored background. (b) Distribution of 4529 diffraction patterns classified with respect to the diffraction intensity and C sym scores. (c) Distribution of pixel positions assigned as center-of-symmetry searched using C sym scores for diffraction patterns with the 500 highest intensities (indicated by an arrow) in (b) in the MPCCD-Octal detector (left) and the MPCCD-Dual detector. The search is carried out for pixels around the direct-beam position (0, 0) determined by equation (1).