Table 1.
CDT and VDT Reproducibility: Test 1 vs. Test 4 and Means of Trial 1 vs. Trial 2
| Measure | CDT Test 1 | CDT Test 4 | VDT Test 1 | VDT Test 4 |
| Mean JND | 16.9 ± 4.73 | 16.20 ± 5.17 | 21.08 ± 1.88 | 20.42 ± 3.62 |
| Approximate Change from Baseline | −7.3 | −5.2 | 172.5 | 120 |
| (°C for CDT or μm for VDT ) | ||||
| ICC | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.75 | 0.75 |
|
| ||||
| Measure | CDT | CDT | VDT | VDT |
| MeanTrial 1 | MeanTrial 2 | MeanTrial 1 | MeanTrial 2 | |
| Mean JND | 16.23 ± 5.18 | 15.85 ± 5.63 | 21.32 ± 1.94 | 20.64 ± 3.45 |
| Approximate Change from Baseline | −5.3 | −4.5 | 172 | 127 |
| (°C for CDT or μm for VDT ) | ||||
| ICC | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.55 | 0.55 |
JND: Just noticeable difference: discrete magnitudes of stimulation by the CASE IV device exponential algorithmic function; CDT, cold detection threshold; VDT, vibration detection threshold; ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient. Approximate change from baseline is mean of minimum degrees of temperature/ μm vibration required for patients to perceive stimulus from baseline temperature/ vibration at beginning of CASE IV testing paradigm.