Skip to main content
. 2015 May 6;6:582. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00582

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Corrected recognition scores (hit rate—false alarm rate) in Experiment 1. Unpleasant distractors caused a detrimental effect on WM accuracy, compared to neutral and pleasant distractors (*p < 0.005; **p < 0.001). (B) Mean reaction times for accurate recognitions in Experiment 1. Unpleasant distractors caused a slower performance on WM, compared to neutral and pleasant distractors (*p < 0.005; **p < 0.0001). Error bars represent standard error of mean.