Table 3. Regressional relationships of SOC and STC determined between by the elemental analyzer and by the modified Walkley-Black (MWB) method in 9 soil types (accroding to the GSCC, Genetic Soil Classification of China) on the Tibetan Plateau using a linear regression passing through the origin.
Soil type | SOCCNS vs. SOCMWB | SOCCNS vs. STC | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | Slope | R2 | P | Slope | R2 | P | |
Felty soils | 139 | 1.047 | 0.975 | <0.001 | 0.963 | 0.987 | <0.001 |
Meadow soils | 80 | 1.089 | 0.988 | <0.001 | 0.823 | 0.944 | <0.001 |
Frigid frozen soils | 20 | 1.091 | 0.986 | <0.001 | 0.769 | 0.973 | <0.001 |
Castanozems | 100 | 1.106 | 0.980 | <0.001 | 0.802 | 0.970 | <0.001 |
Dark felty soils | 36 | 1.131 | 0.952 | <0.001 | 0.968 | 0.917 | <0.001 |
Cold calcic soils | 39 | 1.135 | 0.984 | <0.001 | 0.745 | 0.952 | <0.001 |
Chernozems | 20 | 1.165 | 0.975 | <0.001 | 0.715 | 0.982 | <0.001 |
Brown pedocals | 38 | 1.213 | 0.986 | <0.001 | 0.596 | 0.986 | <0.001 |
Frigid calcic soils | 240 | 1.215 | 0.983 | <0.001 | 0.672 | 0.913 | <0.001 |
SOCCNS, the difference between STC and SIC; SOCMWB, SOC determined by the MWB method.