Skip to main content
. 2015 May 6;10(5):e0126372. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126372

Table 3. Regressional relationships of SOC and STC determined between by the elemental analyzer and by the modified Walkley-Black (MWB) method in 9 soil types (accroding to the GSCC, Genetic Soil Classification of China) on the Tibetan Plateau using a linear regression passing through the origin.

Soil type SOCCNS vs. SOCMWB SOCCNS vs. STC
n Slope R2 P Slope R2 P
Felty soils 139 1.047 0.975 <0.001 0.963 0.987 <0.001
Meadow soils 80 1.089 0.988 <0.001 0.823 0.944 <0.001
Frigid frozen soils 20 1.091 0.986 <0.001 0.769 0.973 <0.001
Castanozems 100 1.106 0.980 <0.001 0.802 0.970 <0.001
Dark felty soils 36 1.131 0.952 <0.001 0.968 0.917 <0.001
Cold calcic soils 39 1.135 0.984 <0.001 0.745 0.952 <0.001
Chernozems 20 1.165 0.975 <0.001 0.715 0.982 <0.001
Brown pedocals 38 1.213 0.986 <0.001 0.596 0.986 <0.001
Frigid calcic soils 240 1.215 0.983 <0.001 0.672 0.913 <0.001

SOCCNS, the difference between STC and SIC; SOCMWB, SOC determined by the MWB method.